Create a custom theme
1
How do you like the 3.2 so far?
better than last version
The old version was better, i dont like the new design etc...
it is bad on so many levels... i don't like the skin, profile area is terrible, in firefox i don't have spell check!! wtf you did with the text area?
skin 0 of 10
script(if 90% of mods from 3.1 works) 8 of 10
skin 0 of 10
script(if 90% of mods from 3.1 works) 8 of 10
It's terrible. And by terrible I mean amazing. The design is much better then the one in 3.1 and all most browsers have spell check that works in ckeditor
The profiles looks awful! 3.2 feels too corporate. Member photos and member avatars are being merged, is a big no-no.
Excellent! I like more than the old (3.1)
Sorry for my bad English, I'm from Argentina.
Sorry for my bad English, I'm from Argentina.
Shadow82x, on 03 June 2011 - 02:24 PM, said:
It's terrible. And by terrible I mean amazing. The design is much better then the one in 3.1 and all most browsers have spell check that works in ckeditor
I can't seem to get mine to work with ckeditor
http://afterthedeadline.com/
Interesting as my opinions are more to the positive side 
Then again I always see the default skin as the base for which I mold my own layouts
Then again I always see the default skin as the base for which I mold my own layouts
The Old Man, on 05 June 2011 - 03:38 AM, said:
The profiles looks awful! 3.2 feels too corporate. Member photos and member avatars are being merged, is a big no-no.
I am sure there will be a mod to make sure members can have both even after 3.2. Personally I never understood the use of two different images and did not like it at all, so the change is good for me
S2eve, on 03 June 2011 - 12:56 PM, said:
it is bad on so many levels... i don't like the skin, profile area is terrible, in firefox i don't have spell check!! wtf you did with the text area? skin 0 of 10 script(if 90% of mods from 3.1 works) 8 of 10
Have you checked if this is a known issue with the editor?
Personally I much prefer the new Profile area over the old one and the skin is a good base
I love it...
My site is currently in development and it shoudl fit in nicely. As far as it being too corporate, you can skin it afterward to make it suit your needs. The boards which don't skin heavily will probably be pretty corporate or serious sites anyway...
My site is currently in development and it shoudl fit in nicely. As far as it being too corporate, you can skin it afterward to make it suit your needs. The boards which don't skin heavily will probably be pretty corporate or serious sites anyway...
It's excellent, can't wait for it to be deployed on our site.
Actually, I really like it. I'm still feeling my way around but I'm finding it great. Looks clean. We've added user color scheme buttons. The users are settling in even as I keep adding hooks.
My team likes it alot.
My team likes it alot.
I like it, but we can't upgrade to it because we spent so much time developing our website skin.
I definitely like most of the updates. Skinning is actually quite easy for the new version as well. I hope they keep all of the comments in the skin when releasing the full version, certainly helped skinning it. I love the updated use of Ajax loading around the board, everything fits in smoother with it, it would seem. And the user menu update was a much-needed improvement. So all in all, I'd give it either an 8.5 or 9 out of 10 stars.
Top post. I look forward to reading more. Thank you for sharing. pellet mill
It's bad that it is so good, bad for other forum softwares, good for me.
Recent Entries
-
3.2 - good or bad?03 June 2011
Recent Comments
-
3.2 - good or bad?By ørret
Jun 13 2011 02:08 PM -
3.2 - good or bad?By karen123456
Jun 12 2011 09:20 PM -
3.2 - good or bad?By PW Nowe
Jun 12 2011 04:15 PM -
3.2 - good or bad?By Interferon
Jun 11 2011 02:37 PM -
3.2 - good or bad?By DanaWhite
Jun 09 2011 01:25 PM
Categories
0 user(s) viewing
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
My Picture
