chilihead

+Clients
  • Content count

    3422
  • Joined

  • Last visited


About chilihead

  • Rank
    Needs Hobby

Recent Profile Visitors


132,287 profile views

chilihead's Activity

  1. chilihead added a post in a topic: best answer 3.4.x vs 4.x   

    I plan on disabling Best Answer before I upgrade to 4 as it works totally different. I also have it activated in forums where not everything is a question.
    Content Highlights is coming and I hope it is more like the removed feature we had in 3.4, with some additions.
  2. chilihead added a post in a topic: Suggestion: allow bulk email to all users / all users in a group   

    ​Well I have this: "Send me news and information" UNticked, and I still receive security emails from IPS, as I should. But we don't have this ability with our IPS.
    It seems unfair they strip it because they also host sites. Why not just strip it from the hosted sites?
    I would like to see this added or as a mod, I have had the rare case where I have needed it. Thanks
  3. chilihead added a comment: Pages databases and attachments in editor   

    Basically why have the Uploads field (which has control over single or multiple) AND attachments in the editor which has no control and we can't turn it off. Makes no sense they work against each other.
    In IP.Content attachments were simply stripped from the editor so the control was in the field(s).
    Some databases I may not want images at all, but want the editor. That's what separate fields are for. Can't do that anymore.
    PS. Once that is sorted you should add a "Can Upload" permission to the database permissions so we can further control the Uploads field. This is more of a suggestion, and I am more concerned about the above, but as it is once the field is added anyone can use it. This would be a good addition for further control. Thanks
  4. chilihead added a bug in Bug Tracker   

    Pages databases and attachments in editor
    In the new Pages the Uploads field replaces attachments and single file uploads. I get that. We can allow one image or multiple. BUT in IP.Content the attachments ability was stripped from the editor so we had image control and in 4.0 it is there, meaning, you can't control the number of attachments anymore, they can upload images via the editor if you don't want them to.
    I have a few databases where I want them to upload single images in certain areas of the template and that is it. Now in 4.0 they can upload unlimited via the editor because it is based on core permissions. Is this a bug that it is not stripped from the editor like in the old version? It also screws with layout. I don't want images in the body that's why we have the Uploads field so we can place them where we want. It has to be a bug or oversight as attachments in the editor does not make sense and works against the benefits of the Uploads field. 
    • 1 reply
    • 43 views
  5. chilihead added a post in a topic: Name History   

    Yes please!
    Not sure why that was removed. It helps with security and assurance. 
  6. chilihead added a post in a topic: Close a poll PLEASE   

    Looks like I'll have to see a mod.
  7. chilihead added a post in a topic: Bring Back Attachments Custom Field Type to Pages   

    So we lost control over number of images with attachments in the editor now? Clarification? Not speaking of the custom field.
  8. chilihead added a post in a topic: Bring Back Attachments Custom Field Type to Pages   

    ​Any input?
  9. chilihead added a bug in Bug Tracker   

    4.0 Moving a topic marks as unread
    4.0 Moving a topic marks as unread.
    • 0 replies
    • 21 views
  10. chilihead added a post in a topic: Bring Back Attachments Custom Field Type to Pages   

    Since attachments is a custom field (Uploads) that handles single and multiple uploads and replaces "single file" and attachments, shouldn't the attachment field be removed from the editor like it was in IP.Content? Or else we have no control.
    I may be missing something. I'll ask @Lindy. Thanks!
  11. chilihead added a comment: Commerce bug?   

    Thanks for pointing that out!
     
  12. chilihead added a post in a topic: Bring Back Attachments Custom Field Type to Pages   

    ​Would any staff be able to address this?
  13. chilihead added a post in a topic: Examples of galleries? Video pages?   

    Nope just uploads. They really need to add that ability! 
  14. chilihead added a post in a topic: Bring Back Attachments Custom Field Type to Pages   

    What I am still not understanding is, there is still the attachment function in the editor based on core permissions. So they can upload using the editor if you don't want them to? And where do the attachments go, since you layout the templates yourself with the fields? Are they hidden? 
  15. chilihead added a bug in Bug Tracker   

    This site (-1) comments?

    • 1 reply
    • 63 views

Status Feed

  1. chilihead » Marcher Technologies

    Thanks for the help.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Not a problem :)