The header feature of the blog would be MUCH more useful in customization if the header field was optional and only the tile field required. I would also like to see the ability for users to upload their own custom header tile image for the background and choose the color of the text (with a pre-designated default font that can't be changed by the user).
As it stands right now, you have to make sure that the right of the header image matches perfectly with the left side of the tiled image, otherwise it looks terrible. Is there any hope for having this small change added in a later release?
Sheer space IMO. For example, I have a field that I only want a website URL placed in. The WYSIWYG editor takes up a tremendous amount of space on the screen, way too much for such a simple thing like inserting a URL.
Perhaps an even better option would be to create custom fields? Something where I could say anything in this text input box, parse as bold, or as a URL, etc (chosen from a list in the ACP). Just a thought.
I have tried this and it didn't work, so I'm just assuming that we can't use bbCode in text input/text area fields? I don't want to use the WYSIWYG for a simple entry like a single URL. Would love the ability to just have the user wrap it in linkgoeshere
I have a database I'm working on that really needs to have static sorting for categories. It would be great if we could have the choice in the ACP to sort A-Z / Z-A or have the ability to drag categories up/down to position them manually like we do with forums.
It would be absolutely exceptional if we were given a choice in the ACP to have a user's avatar be the global representation of that user instead of the current method which is having avatar and personal photos in parallel. I, along with many others from what I gather in various posts I've found, feel that having both separated is slightly confusing to the user and really doesn't give good representation to that user. Sure, it may work better in a business environment like you guys have here, but it doesn't work well with many of our forum setups and the way they have organically grown.
This post has a solution, but obviously requires editing the source code...something that would likely be overwritten in the next minor release and every release afterward. Seems like it would be a great choice to give admins a choice of how their board is setup. Allow personal photos and avatars, or only allow avatars globally. Please find it in your hearts to make this a reality in a future release. :)
I'm glad to hear that development of 3.0 is progressing, but I'm very alarmed at the discontinuing of the subscriptions manager. My site is a company for me that generates a good bit of revenue from the subscriptions manager. I wouldn't mind it being discontinued if you offer a direct path for migrating over to IP.Nexus for this purpose, but if this isn't going to be the case then I fear that some customers, including me, are going to be in a bit of a conundrum.
Seems as though once you receive a PM from someone other than yourself the problem corrects itself, or at least corrects by 1 so if you had -1 messages, received one from someone else it would show 0, but once you read that new PM it would remain at 0.
Where is the original? I cannot find where this has been documented before. I saw a similar issue for the ACP but not the opposite. My ACP is reporting the version as fine, just not on the forum pages.
To add to this, it appears that any cache files for a skinset are being made as user "nobody" on the server and not the username for the account it resides. By using this method it is impossible for you to chmod something as it will give you a permissions denied since you are logged in as that account on the host and not as nobody. Only by going through the shell and logging in via root can you change the permissions on the file/directory in which case it is reverted to user nobody when you rebuild the cache for that skinset.