Love the mod - thank you very much for it. Was wondering if there was a way to cache the results by the hour? Mod works fine on my board but had to disable it as it was slowing down homepage load times by a couple seconds once members online today gets up too high (800+). Seems like simply caching the results rather than running query every time would fix issue and optimize speed for higher use boards.
Thanks for the reply - your suggestion DOES work. The only downfall is that entire page has to load first displaying the error message and then redirecting. It seems like there would have to be a custom hook to have redirect check perform before the entire page loads (i.e., as to not display the error message first and then redirect after page load).
I was wondering if there was an option to set a URL redirect in place of a Custom 'Permission Denied' Message for forums requiring users to be logged in to view. The idea here is that instead of displaying that a user needs to login in order to view the forum, I want to simply redirect them to the login screen.
I had a couple members of my community ask if it was possible to "quote a post directly to a Private Message". This was a feature that was available in phpBB and they have grown accustomed to (especially the moderators). Right now you can PM anyone directly from any post but without actually quoting the post unless you copied over the quote manually.
I'm trying to figure out the template code I would need to test against a specific FORUM ID. I thought it might something along the lines of what I have below but it is not working. I'm sure my syntax and/or logic in general is off but hopefully you get the idea of what I am trying to accomplish here.
Something great goes here.
Any ideas on how to do this?
If we are looking to disable signature links for basic members, is there a way to batch process and remove the links of those who do have them in their signature without going through each member individually? As it stands right now, the signatures all get converted over with links and remain there so long as the user doesn't try to update their signature.
The biggest advantage is the ability to serve the images over HTTP or HTTPS though. IP NEXUS owners are not able to use "Use https for sensitive information? " option without breaking all images served on that page and triggering a browser warning of a non-secure website.
Thank you for the response and explanation. That is a good question and I would expect the "100 image limit" to apply to each user individually based on what group they belonged to. For example, basic members could upload 100 images while paid members would see their limit increased to 500 images.
Currently IP.Gallery allows a category upload limit based only on disk quotas specified for given groups. I would like to see the option to limit the category uploads allowed based on images (i.e., basic members are allowed to upload 100 images to the gallery). This option is currently allowed for albums but not for categories.
There are two main reasons that I'd think this feature would be beneficial.
1.) Usability - my community members are not that savoy from an IT standpoint. They don't know the difference between a megabyte and kilobyte, but they would understand if they are allowed to upload 10 more images.
You have used 36.64K of 9.77mb (max per upload: 9.73mb)
You have used 15 of 100 image uploads
2.) The "Max per upload" gets readjusted based on how much disk space the end user has left available without consideration to how much actual server space the image they are uploading is actually going to take up. For example: a user has 4MB of space left, they try and upload a 5MB image and are unable to because system thinks that will put them over the quota even though we resize the image and do not keep the originals so this 5MB image only actually takes up 50K of space but user is rejected from upload.
IP.Gallery already has this feature built into the albums so hopefully part of the framework is already there for this option to be implemented.