Thanks for helping out Ralf! Well, I know that I can edit the CSS. I would love to hear if there are other options on the table though. I like the default CSS in 4.0, just do not enjoy how the upgrade is handled for empty lines and wanted to hear if there are any solutions/suggestions. Or an upgrade procedure change coming soon?
I did a test upgrade from 3.4.7 to 4.0.1. There were few minor issues here and there but overall all looks good. The most major concern so far I have after the upgrade is the double lining/spacing on articles/posts etc. Many posts and articles, where an extra empty line or 2 was put intentionally to better separate paragraphs in 3.4.7, look with way too much extra space after the upgrade to 4.0.1. As I understand it this is because of the difference of the editors and how they handle paragraphs, new lines etc etc. This is a big concern for me. Obviously, I can not go and check one by one many thousands of posts, articles etc. and fix them manually. And they definitely do not look good now. This is maybe the only thing that prevents me to upgrade now. Anyone any ideas for me? @Charles or @bfarber or anyone else from IPS, any thoughts or suggestions here? Any way to deal with this in a smart and automatic way? What about if during upgrade there is an optional checkbox for automatic removal of extra empty lines? Or something like that? Or any way to deal with this after the upgrade?
I'm happy to wait a bit more to have things a bit more polished. Beta 8 and even Beta 9 if needed makes sense to me - to fix all important recent bugs found. I would rather wait few more weeks than having to deal with many issues for RC1. And I see plenty of bugs in the Bugs Report, some of them are for very important functionality not working in Beta 7 (Pages, upgrades) etc.
Hey IPS guys, In previous versions of IPB we had default Articles layout/template that was different compared to the ones of other Pages databases. I found it very useful. Do you guys still intend to have such a default articles layout/template for IPS 4. I asked a similar question in the previous beta version forum (the url that is not accessible any more) and I remember that there was even a screenshot posted with the intended default articles layout/template for IPS 4. Did you change your mind? Let me know and keep up the good work!