Jump to content


Photo

Serve Scaled Images in Board Index


Not necessarily a high priority bug. But user avatars/profile photos are 30px x 30px in board index and all of them are served through scaled 100px x 100px images. Can we get true 30px thumbs also generated to reduce index load times/image sizes?

Examples from Mazda626.net and google PageSpeed

The following images are resized in HTML or CSS. Serving scaled images could save 61.1KiB (49% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-30304.jpg?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 10.6KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/uploads/profile/photo-8167.gif?_r=0 is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 9.3KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/uploads/profile/photo-520.jpg?_r=0 is resized in HTML or CSS from 99x84 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 9.0KiB (89% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-3578.gif?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 5.4KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../image_url-30825-1340373448_thumb.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 213x160 to 180x120. Serving a scaled image could save 2.8KiB (37% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../image_url-30637-1340228851_thumb.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 213x160 to 180x120. Serving a scaled image could save 2.8KiB (37% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-30775.jpg?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 2.6KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../image_url-29560-1338929745_thumb.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 213x160 to 180x120. Serving a scaled image could save 2.6KiB (37% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-19340.jpg?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 2.6KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/uploads/av-21594.jpg?_r=0 is resized in HTML or CSS from 99x99 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 2.3KiB (90% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../image_url-19133-1334983517_thumb.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 240x135 to 180x120. Serving a scaled image could save 2.0KiB (34% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-28979.jpg?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 2.0KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-27596.jpg?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 100x100 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 1.7KiB (91% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/uploads/av-3478.jpg?_r=0 is resized in HTML or CSS from 99x75 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 1.7KiB (87% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../photo-thumb-18643.gif?... is resized in HTML or CSS from 90x90 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 1.5KiB (88% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../image_url-26685-1334240176_thumb.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 120x160 to 180x120. Serving a scaled image could save 1.0KiB (25% reduction).
http://mazda626.net/.../default_large.png is resized in HTML or CSS from 150x150 to 30x30. Serving a scaled image could save 889B (96% reduction).

Status: Not a Bug
Version: 3.3.3
Fixed In:


1 Comments

The image used in board index is the thumbnail we generate for general use, that would require to change the code and save also a smaller thumbnail. This is working as intended for now but you're welcome to post your suggestions in the feedback area :)