the BBC news page continues to get cluttered
#1
Posted 03 August 2006 - 03:38 AM
#2
Posted 03 August 2006 - 03:55 AM
#3
Posted 03 August 2006 - 03:59 AM
Not too bad for me, but I think they could make it wider and realize not as many people view that low of a screen size anymore.
https://www.paypal.c...tton_id=3593168 Donations
www.kevenfox.com coming soon.
Member of the upcoming Saviah Wildlife organization
New Update: Sorry, my sites are down. My hosting ran out due to us being broke.
#4
Posted 03 August 2006 - 04:06 AM
They added them and weren't there before... so... now it's basically distracting.
#5
Posted 03 August 2006 - 09:56 AM
#11
Posted 03 August 2006 - 04:01 PM
Which news sources do you consider less biased?
#12
Posted 03 August 2006 - 05:30 PM
Eh, no news source is perfect.
#14
Posted 03 August 2006 - 08:28 PM
there aren't any "unbiased" news sources. even the AP has an agenda
#15
Posted 03 August 2006 - 11:09 PM
#16
Posted 03 August 2006 - 11:12 PM
The difference between the BBC and other organisations is the BBC's is unintentional where it occurs, and they work to remove it as far as they can, whereas many other organisations have an intentional bias.
[edit]Oh, about the site... I wasn't keen on them at first, but I'm getting used to them.
I have it on good authority that if you type "Google" into Google, you can break the internet.
My flickr photos
#17
Posted 03 August 2006 - 11:15 PM
Eh, no news source is perfect.
But yes of course, no news source is 100% unbiased, because news is written by human beings and no matter how hard you try humans will always subconsciously bias the news, even your choice of words, as in the example I gave can bias something. Consider the difference between, for example, referring to a US 'occupation of' Iraq, or a US 'presence in' Iraq.
[url="http://www.last.fm/user/CTerry/?chartstyle=recenttracks3"]
[/url][url="http://www.last.fm/user/CTerry/?chartstyle=recenttracks5"]
[/url]
#18
Posted 03 August 2006 - 11:17 PM
The BBC certainly has no agenda, and certainly has no intention of being a biased new agency. They are without a doubt the most impartial, unbiased and reliable news agency around the world. I'm in Spain at the moment and have only two English channels CNNi and BBC World - I had no idea that around the world people had access to the same quality BBC News reporting that we get in the UK, with barely any advertising. Although it is strange to see advertising on the BBC.
I don't know if you've been reading along with "The Editors" blog - if you haven't it's the last link on the left hand menu bar - but there's lots of useful blog post in there. There's many posts where people have written in saying "your coverage is biased towards israel' and then you get people writing in about the same report and programme saying "your coverage is biased towards palestine". They must be doing something right if people think things are biased in different directions.
I wanted to point you to a link to "Newswatch" but I can't seem to get to it from Spain... I'm not sure if it's a UK only thing, but I get a 403 forbidden on my usual bookmark for it... So instead.. how many news outlets do you know are so open about their sources? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/help/3281815.stm
Of course I agree with the poster who said it's impossible to avoid people's prejudices in reporting the news, there's no way of making a person impartial, but the BBC ALWAYS tries to contrast one opinion with another in order to allow the viewer to make up their own mind.
As for the bars, they're growing on me.
Quote
#20
Posted 03 August 2006 - 11:59 PM
That'll make the BBC biased then!
Quote

Help






















