Sign In
Register
Help
R.I.P. this thread
IPB 3.0 Idea
SEO Friendly Urls + Pips
Rate Topic:
#41
Stuart Elliott 
- My 501st post was calling Matt a Cabbage Patch Kid
-
- Group: +Active Customers
- Posts: 1,200
- Joined: 07-June 04
- Location:Stalybridge, England
Posted 30 June 2007 - 08:11 AM
R.I.P. this thread
Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not all out to get you.
MultiQuote
#44
Gärrett
- A woodchuck that chucks wood?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,409
- Joined: 27-May 08
- Location:Phoenix, AZ, USA
-
Posted 30 July 2008 - 01:53 AM
Spunkyasp, on Jul 29 2008, 05:32 PM, said:
I think you should make a feature that the owner of the board can not be modified by other root administrators.
I've said it before, but if you can't trust someone to not mess with your account if you explicitly tell them not to, then they shouldn't be root admins.
Regards,
Garrett
Garrett
#45
OpenWare
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: +Active Customers
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 21-September 06
- Location:Waterford, Ireland
Posted 30 July 2008 - 02:27 AM
Spunkyasp, on Jul 30 2008, 01:32 AM, said:
I think you should make a feature that the owner of the board can not be modified by other root administrators.
Easiest way to do that.. add an additional parameter to the conf_global file like what vB does.. where you can add the user ID's of members (i.e. the owners) that cannot be edited/deleted from the ACP.
The way I rationalise it is.. the only people that need to be Root Admins, are the site owners/technical staff, who /need/ that extra level of access, the regular admin a/c is where I place all my admins into on every site I work on, I dont give anyone access they dont need.
#46
MaNiAc LRSC
- IPB Member
-
- Group: +Active Customers
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 17-April 02
Posted 02 August 2008 - 02:03 PM
Some of you guys don't understand what McQ says.
The webservers don't need to rewrite the URLs to FURLS if IPB 3.0 would convert the old number based links to FURLS already within the database. That's the easiest way and there are no compability issues.
Im a Admin who is dependent on search engine traffic, so if there will be no FURL / good SEO support in 3.0, i will convert to another boad.
The webservers don't need to rewrite the URLs to FURLS if IPB 3.0 would convert the old number based links to FURLS already within the database. That's the easiest way and there are no compability issues.
Im a Admin who is dependent on search engine traffic, so if there will be no FURL / good SEO support in 3.0, i will convert to another boad.
