45 replies to this topic

[Stuart Elliott]

R.I.P. this thread

[Millar]

SEO friendly URL's are just what I would love. A lot of money is spent by board owners buyin SEO mods, IPB would be a lot more appealing with SEO urls.

[Spunkyasp]

I think you should make a feature that the owner of the board can not be modified by other root administrators.

[Gärrett]

Spunkyasp, on Jul 29 2008, 05:32 PM, said:

I think you should make a feature that the owner of the board can not be modified by other root administrators.

I've said it before, but if you can't trust someone to not mess with your account if you explicitly tell them not to, then they shouldn't be root admins.

[OpenWare]

Spunkyasp, on Jul 30 2008, 01:32 AM, said:

I think you should make a feature that the owner of the board can not be modified by other root administrators.

Easiest way to do that.. add an additional parameter to the conf_global file like what vB does.. where you can add the user ID's of members (i.e. the owners) that cannot be edited/deleted from the ACP.

The way I rationalise it is.. the only people that need to be Root Admins, are the site owners/technical staff, who /need/ that extra level of access, the regular admin a/c is where I place all my admins into on every site I work on, I dont give anyone access they dont need.

[MaNiAc LRSC]

Some of you guys don't understand what McQ says.
The webservers don't need to rewrite the URLs to FURLS if IPB 3.0 would convert the old number based links to FURLS already within the database. That's the easiest way and there are no compability issues.

Im a Admin who is dependent on search engine traffic, so if there will be no FURL / good SEO support in 3.0, i will convert to another boad.