37 replies to this topic

[Chillyware]

I have quite a fast Internet connections.

IPB 3.2 to slow for me,
smilly not working :-(

[TeamJesus]

smiles work and its fast for me

[.Ian]

Not seeing any speed issues and I am a long way from the server.

[Chillyware]

not if you start a topic

And yes, SLOW slow slow

[Charles]

It's not slow slow we are working working on things things in the background

[Chillyware]

Yes I know Charles,

yes today the sit is slow,I had to complain

[Charles]

Why did you have to complain if you knew that already?

[Breadfan]

not if you start a topic

And yes, SLOW slow slow

It's not slow slow we are working working on things things in the background

Why do you have to say things multiple times?
It's not slow slow, it's ok. ok. on my end.

[jscieza]

[Chillyware]

I only hope the speed wil come back

Yesterday it was FASSSSSSSST

And I like the

1 new replies added. Show me

[ShadyX]

744 users are online (in the past 30 minutes)

[Snookputt]

No speed problems this end, works perfectly, nice one IPS and keep up the good work

[Tigratrus]

<p>Actually we've been seeing a ton of slowdowns and broken output (Server too busy, CSS doesn't get downloaded so you get a broken layout etc) since it went live. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>BUT</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Keep in mind that this is essentially a late Alpha/VERY early Beta version that is (apparently) being actively developed against. While Susan and I TOTALLY share the concern about speed (fast pages are vastly better for member experience and for somewhat for SEO), I'm going to wait till Charles and Co are done with this phase and feel that it's ready to be downloaded for Beta testing before getting too concerned. Even then speed optimization will likely continue to be an issue that's worked as they iterate through the Beta versions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Love the new version. Very excited about the future, and looking forward to GETTING OUR GRUBBY MITS ON THE BETA! I really REALLY want to see the new CSS. I *was* hoping that they might go to one of the CSS grid systems (http://960.gs/ or http://www.blueprintcss.org/) to help with layout, it looks like it's ALMOST on a grid... But it doesn't line up QUITE exactly right. Oh... Dang it's fluid and I just happened to have my browser set to a size that ALMOST made it a 960 width. Can't really tell until there is a fixed style (hate fluid) available to check.</p>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ahh well, the CSS overhaul to fix the consistency across Apps was by far the biggest need for styling. Looks much better just browsing it in Firebug!</p>

Let's see if it strips them out if I edit it... Nope.
Let's try toggling the wysiwyg and back. Nope, still there.
Maybe edit, toggle wysiwyg off and THEN save? Nope.

Edited by Tigratrus, 03 June 2011 - 11:56 AM.

[Divine Forces]

Fast as usual for me...

[Rhett]

<p>Actually we've been seeing a ton of slowdowns and broken output (Server too busy, CSS doesn't get downloaded so you get a broken layout etc) since it went live. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>BUT</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Keep in mind that this is essentially a late Alpha/VERY early Beta version that is (apparently) being actively developed against. While Susan and I TOTALLY share the concern about speed (fast pages are vastly better for member experience and for somewhat for SEO), I'm going to wait till Charles and Co are done with this phase and feel that it's ready to be downloaded for Beta testing before getting too concerned. Even then speed optimization will likely continue to be an issue that's worked as they iterate through the Beta versions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Love the new version. Very excited about the future, and looking forward to GETTING OUR GRUBBY MITS ON THE BETA! I really REALLY want to see the new CSS. I *was* hoping that they might go to one of the CSS grid systems (http://960.gs/ or http://www.blueprintcss.org/) to help with layout, it looks like it's ALMOST on a grid... But it doesn't line up QUITE exactly right. Oh... Dang it's fluid and I just happened to have my browser set to a size that ALMOST made it a 960 width. Can't really tell until there is a fixed style (hate fluid) available to check.</p>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ahh well, the CSS overhaul to fix the consistency across Apps was by far the biggest need for styling. Looks much better just browsing it in Firebug!</p>

who the hell is susan? lmao

and what browser are you using? as it's parsing tags at the moment.

[Mike54]

Susan would be his significant other.

[JahLion]

This topic is so funny

[Tigratrus]

who the hell is susan? lmao

and what browser are you using? as it's parsing tags at the moment.

Yea, I saw the tags showing up after I posted, that's weird. Let's see if it happens again...

As Mike54 said, Susan's my wife/partner and our site designer/css wrangler.

I posted that (and this response too) via an up-to-date Chrome. I've been poking around with firebug on my FF, but I usually use Chrome for my main view/posting since it's soooooo much less of a resource hog than FF.

James

Nope... No tags this time!

[Enkidu]

I only hope the speed wil come back

Yesterday it was FASSSSSSSST

And I like the

I haven't had the chance to see the online reply notification yet ):

Someone reply reply please

[Heosforo]

I haven't had the chance to see the online reply notification yet ):

Someone reply reply please

x2