This is bad for SEO and users_http://mypage.com/page/library/_/category/article-title
1. URL to one article is not SEO friendly, see the official video of Google discussing about deep links
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_A1iRY6XTM&feature=player_embedded
(a) They say literally "it is not a MAJOR factor". So, it IS a factor and IP.Content has negative impact on SEO.
(b) They say it should be logical for the user, but it is not.
2. My users are not able to easily remember the URL. Judge yourself, what is easier and more logical?
or_http://mypage.com/page/library/_/category/article-title
_http://mypage.com/library/category/article-title
We move now to IP.Content from a system where URLs are fully customizable. We have very good search engine ranking for some very popular keywords. However, it is not possible for us to use our previous logical structure
We should go to unlogical, unfriendly and ugly alternative and probably loose some positions in search ranking._http://mypage.com/library/category/article-title
Dear IPS! What is sooooooooo difficult in giving us flexible URL structure in IP.Content? Please do not say, it is impossible, major system with CMS component do this with ease. I am very disappointed to see that nothing has been done in IP.Content 2.3 Dev Update: SEO Improvements http://community.inv...o-improvements/ to improve URL structure.












