Find content
Male
Steven UK, on 25 May 2012 - 12:01 PM, said:
You really think this is JUST about tags? You may want to read the thread again.
Posts I've Made
In Topic: SEO Rankings flying all over the place, and why is this..
24 May 2012 - 01:45 PM
Heyhoe, on 24 May 2012 - 01:21 PM, said:
Good points. Just a thought 
It's a shame there is no better system for upgrading skins. I personally only make minor CSS and template changes to the default skin, but every time there is a new update I have to revert it all and manually change it all back to how i want it. Otherwise i risk missing features or bug fixes of the new release.
Not ideal with the current rate of updates....
Sorry to take this off topic. This was about SEO.
It's a shame there is no better system for upgrading skins. I personally only make minor CSS and template changes to the default skin, but every time there is a new update I have to revert it all and manually change it all back to how i want it. Otherwise i risk missing features or bug fixes of the new release.
Not ideal with the current rate of updates....
Sorry to take this off topic. This was about SEO.
The Merge Center does have the same functionality, but I've never got on with it.
In Topic: SEO Rankings flying all over the place, and why is this..
24 May 2012 - 07:20 AM
Steven UK, on 24 May 2012 - 06:44 AM, said:
Matt, what about these type of entries being indexed as a preference by the SERPS:
http://www.makemoney...&search_app=ccs
The above just should not be in the equation really, and neither should search results. How can Google spiders do a search?
Not moaning, mate, well... haha.. But the way the software is set up IS most definitely damaging SERPS results, no question. I have put considerable testing into this now, and there are so many loose ends, which I am hoping you guys will fix, but you will only fix them if YOU think there is a problem.
I hope so, I really do.. because all the hard work we put in is being undone on a daily basis.
Thanks for reading the thread.
Edit: Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about at the time of writing (SERPS may change this depending on when you view this thread)
http://www.google.co...lient=firefox-a
Check the 2nd and 3rd entry from our forum, the second one is tags, and the third one is a search entry (stating no results found on a blank page), with the original thread nowhere to be seen.
http://www.makemoney...&search_app=ccs
The above just should not be in the equation really, and neither should search results. How can Google spiders do a search?
Not moaning, mate, well... haha.. But the way the software is set up IS most definitely damaging SERPS results, no question. I have put considerable testing into this now, and there are so many loose ends, which I am hoping you guys will fix, but you will only fix them if YOU think there is a problem.I hope so, I really do.. because all the hard work we put in is being undone on a daily basis.
Thanks for reading the thread.
Edit: Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about at the time of writing (SERPS may change this depending on when you view this thread)
http://www.google.co...lient=firefox-a
Check the 2nd and 3rd entry from our forum, the second one is tags, and the third one is a search entry (stating no results found on a blank page), with the original thread nowhere to be seen.
In Topic: Improve CKEditor integration for IPB 3.4
23 May 2012 - 03:05 PM
cloudy, on 23 May 2012 - 01:03 PM, said:
Well the editor as it is now is way easier/fun/nicer/etc than the default layout and the one vb is using..
